Filed under: General Idiocy

Lemay, Missouri is what you might call — what many people do call — a hoosier suburb of St. Louis. In most of the world, hoosier means someone from Indiana. In St. Louis, it means a certain kind of shiftless, belligerent urban/suburban white person that a lot of people mistake for a redneck. Hoosiers are not the same as rednecks, but the differences are subtle and hard to spot without a lot of practice.
Because of this, I generally avoid Lemay: but they have a Steak n Shake restaurant there that hasn’t been molested by the company’s bad ideas about renovation, and so tonight Nicole and I went there for dinner. It’s still got the flashing lights all around the roof, though about 80% of those bulbs are now burnt out.

(This and other pictures of this Steak n Shake available here.)
Anyway, as I said before, Lemay is a pretty low-class place. How low-class is it? It’s so low-class that while we were in there, some jackass broke the window of my car and stole my camera.
I was sitting next to the window, just behind the rightmost bollard in this photo:

The car was about 20 feet or so further behind where the photographer was standing. I’m pretty sure I saw the little cocksuckers who did it, too. At about 8:20 p.m. — at which time it was still very bright outside — two guys walked diagonally through the parking lot. One of them was a rangy-looking black guy who looked to be in his early 20s, wearing a do-rag with a really odd giant polka-dotted baseball cap over it. I remember him not only because of the ridiculous hat, but because he spent a lot of time glaring at the Steak n Shake as he was walking through the lot. I’m sure you’ve seen the look; you get it from hoosiers and hillbillies too, but the Young Black Male has really perfected it — a look of pure malevolence, hatred, and menace, a look that probably does more to foster and reinforce white racism in the U.S. than O.J. Simpson ever did. I call it the ‘Kill My Landlord’ look, after an Eddie Murphy SNL sketch from the 1980s.
This is a close approximation of the Kill-My-Landlord Glare, from the cover of the Washington Post magazine in 2004:

This is a picture of Ralph Chambliss, a.k.a. ‘Blyss’, who is allegedly the “King of D.C. Rap”. When he was photographed by the Washington Post, he chose to look at the camera like this. To judge from his demeanor, it’s not good to be the king. What the fuck? I mean: what the fuck? I know that young black men have a hard time of it, but part of that hard time might be the result of looking at people like this. The rap world loves conspicuous consumption, and maybe this is just another example of that. After all, if you can manage to go around looking at people like this not get your head kicked in, you’ve got to be one tough motherfucker.
Anyway, as a white guy I’m pretty used to being glared at by a certain type of young black guy, so I didn’t think much of it.
Hat-and-K.M.L.-Glare Boy’s companion — who only registered on my consciousness as being there, I didn’t really get a good look at him — split off from him as they walked through the lot. Hat Boy walked behind the four or five cars parked there, more or less across the field of view of the photo above. Didn’t-get-a-look-at-him Boy walked between the right side of my car and the car next to it. When we came out 30 minutes or so later, the window was broken. My camera, which had been sitting on the console between the front seats, was gone. A few other things had been tossed around in the front seat, but as the camera was the only thing in the car worth more than about $10, that’s all they took. The camera was worth about $300, the memory card in it about $100, and replacing the window is about $300 more. And this assumes that I won’t be repairing the gouge in the doorframe where they stuck a screwdriver in to break the window. This would likely be ridiculously expensive, so it’ll just stay there as a reminder to me to be less trusting.
So I’m out about $700, and these little jackasses will get about $50 by pawning my camera. And the next time I see young black men glaring at me, I’ll be a little more likely to assume actual menace, instead of just idiot teenage posturing.




Leave a comment
So your thief is thinking, (the camera) “In sight it must be right.”
An nuisance to deal with I’m sure. Obviously, home-owners insurance could cover this if the deductible isn’t higher than your loss(es) or were it to later drive up your premium. Optimistically, if you claim the loss then you’ll be shopping for a replacement soon. What about those 21 minutes you spent phoning nine-one-one? No issues/complaints with reporting the incident? Gasp!
In 1996 my Nikon 35mm camera, its lenses, flash, camera bag and other gear, tripod, tripod bag as well as a tool box full of car tools were all stolen from the trunk of my car parked at the Delmar MetroLink station (at Hodiamont Avenue)while I was away at work for the morning. The replacement value was greater than $700 and the only vehicle damage was a glass loss.
My vehicle was burgled in broad daylight something between 10 am and 4 pm. It was parked on the street in plain view of the platform though not in a commuter lot. The drivers side window was busted, my car-phone clung to its tangle of wires and was unable to be stolen quickly. However, the trunk latch was all too easy to lift for the goodies stowed out of sight. Thankfully the car phone allowed me to phone my insurance agent and the window was replaced the same afternoon. I later was able to claim and replace all of my camera gear (upgrading most of it) and I got all new tools too.
Too bad Steak n’ Shake got rid of curb service you could have eaten in your vehicle and defended it from there by throwing cheese fries as the Lemay banditos. But perhaps it’s best they don’t have that anymore, because you might’ve gotten carjacked anyway. Or as I’ve been seeing a lot of, just had all your wheels taken. People really need locking nuts to thwart this sort of thing.
Interesting that you cited a D.C. rapper, “Did you know?Lemay was once considered as a possible location for the Nation’s Capitol?”
Comment by krispy 07.16.07 @ 13:23We had no troubles with the cops. They were nice and they actually seemed interested. They were county cops, of course. The city cops I’ve dealt with have been OK, but they probably just would have taken a report over the phone.
They surely would not have sent a crime scene guy, and the county did. This was useless because all the places that might have good prints from the thief are textured plastic.
Comment by nicole 07.18.07 @ 11:16Well, it’s not Lemay (which, in my opinion, is not really a place — I used to described where I lived as so far south that Lindbergh ends), my car was broken into in front of my house in Oakland. They broke the back window and cut through the roof, but never got in (and, in any event, I never leave anything in the car to steal). We’re pretty suspicous of the neighbors, as there was a police car at the house the night before and some rang my doorbell in the middle of the night. I explained this to the Oakland cops (as in “I think I might be able to solve this for you”), but they never sent out anyone to look at it. The police told me they would send a form, but never got that either. The damage cost more than $14K to repair. And I didn’t even get any Steak-n-Shake out of it.
Comment by Shaye 07.18.07 @ 23:16Just like a white guy…to remember exactly what the black guy looked like….and go on about it for paragraphs describing him down to his Patented Black Guy Look of Menance(TM all rights Tinotopia) but to not even say that the other guy was white and that you barely registered him.
Oh, you make me laugh Tino. It’s a terrible, silly little laugh of ha ha…like when I laughed at the lady who got off the flight because the men were speaking Arabic and turned out to be Marine trainers. Oh, LOL.
FYI, white folks have their patented looks of menace as well. You wouldn’t notice them, but I do. There the looks that say, “You’re not welcome in this store, restaurant, neighborhood” or “You got past our resume radar but obviously we don’t have any other blacks working here and we sure as hell aren’t going to start now” or “You must have gotten into this school on a scholarship” or “You must have gotten this job because of an affirmative action quota” or “How dare you even look at me, I’m better than you.”
Yeah, white folks menace. That’s where it’s at.
I bet the white guy stole your camera while you were busy cataloging the black guy’s air of “menace”. Like white people who send black people into stores to get followed while the white folks rob the store blind.
Good thing I like you Tino, or this would be a lot longer.
Comment by Deborah 09.04.07 @ 14:52As I say in the post itself, while I didn’t see it happen I’m pretty sure the white kid was the one who actually broke into the car.
I didn’t consider that it might have been a calculated thing on their part, though. The black guy was really, really glaring at the restaurant, and wearing a ridiculous, easily described hat. Attract attention while the other guy does the deed, and then get rid of the hat. Hmm.
However, the result is the same: the next time I’m being glared at by a young black man, I’m going to be even more suspicious and wary. I’m sure that white people glare at black people — hell, they glare at me for no discernible reason often enough — but who’s harmed by that attitude? And who’s harmed by the generalized fear and suspicion on young black men?
Comment by tino 09.04.07 @ 20:35Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>