Filed under: Cultural Note, General Idiocy, Ten Minutes
I am reading Cory Doctorow’s Makers, which, in the version I’m reading, carries a preface about copyright.
In case you don’t know who Doctorow is: he’s a sci-fi author, anti-absolute-copyright activist, and general left-wing complainer, possibly not in that order. He’s originally from Canada and now lives in the UK; as with pretty much all such people, this gives him a special insight as to everything that’s wrong with the United States.
Doctorow’s main issue is copyright, or, more specifically, absolute copyright. Himself, he gives away all (most?) of his writing via his website while at the same time selling the stuff through normal channels. His intention is to be a one-man experiment to prove whether it’s possible to make money from intellectual property without hiring a team of lawyers to sue your fans. So far, it seems to be working.
In the course of explaining why he does this — he quotes Tim O’Reilly in saying that his, and most writers’ — biggest problem isn’t piracy but obscurity — he writes
I have always dreamt of writing sf novels, since I was six years old. Now I do it. It is a goddamned dream come true, like growing up to be a cowboy or an astronaut, except that you don’t get oppressed by ranchers or stuck on the launchpad in an adult diaper for 28 hours at a stretch.
First: astronauts do not spend 28 hours on the launch pad under any circumstances.
Second: note here that he uses cowboys as an example of people who are oppressed. Now, I’m sure that there were and are some bad cowboy jobs. But to see a cowboy — the very symbol of independence and self-determination — as oppressed takes a special kind of view of the world.
And I’ll be forever indebted to Cory Doctorow for illustrating this so perfectly, because his illustration has allowed me to put words to a concept that’s been annoying me for a while.
The activist’s credo is: everyone’s fucked but me.
The argument goes something like this: Things are just fine for me, but everyone else is getting the short end of the stick, and so it is up to me and other similarly comfortable people to fix all of this for them. In many cases, you can add to that: because they are all too stupid to see the truth.
This is why I can respect Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, the Tea Party people, etc., but find ACORN and WTO ‘protests’ disgusting. There’s a big difference between a group of people looking out for itself, making its opinions known, and attempting to influence the government or the culture so that its members will be better off on the one hand, and organizations of the Professionally Outraged, abstractly arguing the cases of other, usually unseen people on the other.
The logical conclusion of this way of thinking is that People in general either
- do not know enough to run their own lives (search for ‘voting against self interest‘ for many examples) or
- the real majority supports X, even though the most accurate measures seem to indicate that people support Y.
Either one in the end justifies autocratic rule by a ‘benevolent’ dictator, and the best part is that you don’t actually have to demonstrate that people are hungry/oppressed/being shipped to Gitmo/whatever: you just assert that they are from your perch of middle-class comfort.
Leave a comment
Actually, calling cowboys oppressed is pretty much a dead-on accurate portrayal of the kind of life the actual historic cowboy lived. At least if you are willing to define oppressed as someone who is paid poorly, works back-breaking tasks for the enrichment of others, and has almost 0 social mobility. Which I suspect someone with Doctorow’s hippie leanings would.
It’s hard to credit him for eschewing myth for reality when he pairs it with the diaper thing though.
Comment by Don 11.18.09 @ 16:50Unless these cowboys of yore were slaves, the problem isn’t so much that they were being ‘oppressed’ as it was that they ‘had shitty jobs’. And the ones who were slaves — I’m sure this was the case for at least some cowboys — were oppressed not because the work was hard, but because they were, you know, slaves and all.
I do not understand how or why these non-slave cowboys would have remained cowboys given the alleged hard work, poor pay, etc., unless they felt that all together they were better off being cowboys than being anything else.
True, some of them might have ultimately decided that the cowboy’s life was for them simply because they couldn’t do anything else; but that’s not oppression, that’s a lack of skills.
Comment by tino 11.19.09 @ 11:13Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>